define('DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT', true);
define('DISALLOW_FILE_MODS', true);
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /homepages/22/d426668184/htdocs/clickandbuilds/WordPress/ItsJustAwesomeDOTcom/wp-config.php:90) in /homepages/22/d426668184/htdocs/clickandbuilds/WordPress/ItsJustAwesomeDOTcom/wp-content/plugins/all-in-one-seo-pack/app/Common/Meta/Robots.php on line 89
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /homepages/22/d426668184/htdocs/clickandbuilds/WordPress/ItsJustAwesomeDOTcom/wp-config.php:90) in /homepages/22/d426668184/htdocs/clickandbuilds/WordPress/ItsJustAwesomeDOTcom/wp-includes/feed-rss2.php on line 8
Mark here with the second installment of my 100-Book Challenge. One of the (many) motivations for this undertaking was to get to those novels I felt embarrassed not to have read yet, so books 11-20 bring us some literary heavy-hitters like Hemingway, Fitzgerald, Austen, Morrison and more. That said, I do not intend my reviews as scholarly commentary, just the opposite; I want to give general readers a quick impression of each work and how much it lends itself to an enjoyable and fulfilling read. Of course, you could teach a full college semester on many of these novels, but we’re not here for that! We’re here to get some pages under our belts. So here we go:
Okay, there you have it. Hope you’re finding your own gems out there. Feel free to mention them in the comments when you do!
The post 100-Book Challenge (Part 2) first appeared on It's Just Awesome DOT com.]]>Mark here, new-comer to The Good the Bad and the Podcast and co-host of the James Bond: Here and There series. Though this site is largely dedicate to cinema, we would be remiss in not giving a little attention to those wonderful packets of plot and profundity that provide so much fodder for movies: books!
And if you’re anything like me, the number of books in your house that you haven’t read greatly outweighs the number you have. Well, I decided to do something about it, and set out to read 100 books in a year. “You’re insane!” I hear you shouting, but not so! The experience so far has enriched me beyond measure, and I challenge you to try it yourself. Wait, wait! Don’t quit reading yet; at least look at the rules I set for myself, and see if they don’t sound reasonable.
The Rules:
There you have it: simple. It’s been just over four months, and I’ve found it easier to keep up than anticipated. Audio-books really help pad the numbers, and you’d be surprised how many minutes a day you can fill with them: cooking dinner? Pop in your headphones! Long car drive? Bust out your aux cable! I even listen while mowing the lawn and working out.
If any of you bibliophiles out there want to join me, I’ll write a separate post for every 10 books I read along the way, letting you know which I think are worth a gander and which you can skip over for something more engaging. Still don’t think you can do it? Try 50 books, that’s only one a week, and just imagine how informed you’ll be by the end! Come onnnnn. Crack one open with me and grab hold of some culture!
Books 1-10:
Well that’s it for now. Got get to reading!
The post “Better than the Movie”? first appeared on It's Just Awesome DOT com.]]>Here are the films:
Independence Day (1996)
Independence Day: Resurgence (2016)
Here are the films:
Armageddon (1998)
Meteor (1979)
Seeking a Friend for the End of the World (2012)
Here are the films:
Love Affair (1939)
Love Story (1970)
Stella Dallas (1937)
Here are the films:
Bridget Jones’s Diary (2001)
From Justin to Kelly (2003)
Gigli (2003)
Pretty Woman (1990)
Sextette (1978)
So I Married an Axe Murderer (1993)
When Harry Met Sally (1989)
You’ve Got Mail (1998)
Here are the films:
Casino Royale (2006)
Quantum of Solace (2008)
Spectre (2015)
Here are the films:
Episode I – The Phantom Menace (1999)
Episode II – Attack of the Clones (2002)
Episode III – Revenge of the Sith (2005)
Episode IV – A New Hope (1977)
Episode V – The Empire Strikes Back (1980)
Episode VI – Return of the Jedi (1983)
The Star Wars Holiday Special (1978)
It’s our first year anniversary and we’re discussing the best, worst and ugliest movies we reviewed last year!!
(Originally recorded and broadcast live on Periscope on August 31, 2015)
In this episode, we talk about doctor movies!!
Here are the films:
Dead Ringers (1988)
Doctor Zhivago (1965)
Magnificent Obsession (1954)
In this episode, we talk about shark movies!!
Here are the films:
Deep Blue Sea (1999)
Jaws (1975)
Mega Shark vs. Giant Octopus (2009)
In this episode, we talk about car movies!!
Here are the films:
Gone in 60 Seconds (1974)
Gone in 60 Seconds (2000)
Smokey and the Bandit (1977)
In this episode, we talk about 80s coming of age movies!!
Here are the films:
Some Kind of Wonderful (1987)
St. Elmo’s Fire (1985)
Teen Witch (1989)
In this episode, we talk about movies directed by Quentin Tarantino with special guest star Mike (not to be confused with Stuntman Mike)!!
Here are the films:
Death Proof (2007)
Inglourious Basterds (2009)
Pulp Fiction (1994)
In this episode, we talk about Survival Movies with special guest star Mike (who happens to be a doctor)!!
Here are the films:
Cast Away (2000)
The Grey (2011)
Swiss Family Robinson (1960)
Here are the films:
The Lady Eve (1941)
Night Nurse (1931)
Walk on the Wild Side (1962)
Here are the films:
Captain America: The Winter Soldier (2014)
The Fantastic Four (1994)
Spider-Man 3 (2007)
The actual work of the team is interesting, but the real joy in this film is what they do the rest of the time. It’s like an episode of M*A*S*H that’s set in Antarctica and directed by Wes Anderson. I love Wes Anderson films, so my bias might be playing into why I enjoyed this film so much. Whether it’s the narration or the awkwardly long close ups of people, this film just oozes Anderson, but that’s a good thing. The feeling that Steve Zissou might show up anytime is great, but the people in this film are plenty interesting on their own. Some seem a bit off, like too much time living on the ice has taken its toll. But some just seem to genuinely love their jobs, and that’s rare and wonderful to see these days.
The world of the film is so bizarre and alien that it becomes a character itself. The sun never sets, white outs are frequent, and they heat their tents with jet fuel. Who lives like that? But they still have movie nights and birthday cakes. It’s a strange and beautiful life they live at the end of the world.
I know this seems odd, I’m reviewing a film that can be seen on Vimeo, not in theaters or video. But maybe that taps into the other reason I love this film. Just like the characters are making a home in the wilderness, so is this film. It’s been released by Studiocanoe, and can be watched for free online. I don’t say that to cheapen the film, like Antarctica itself, this film may be enhanced by the very freedom of accessibility it offers.
I cannot recommend this film enough. It’s fun, it’s gorgeous, and it touches on some serious topics. I hope you watch the film and enjoy Welcome to Union Glacier as much as I did.
The post Welcome to Union Glacier: The Life Antarctic first appeared on It's Just Awesome DOT com.]]>And that difference is that the main character is actually likable.
It’s no secret that I don’t care for Into the Wild. In many ways, I felt like it was a tedious experiment in Oscar Bait. I’m not terribly familiar with Christopher McCandless’ real life, but the character as presented in Sean Penn’s movie always struck me as self absorbed, someone out to prove something that didn’t need to be proved. Someone so incredibly stubborn, they only realized they needed others in their lives as they lay dying alone. Tragic yes, but not a relatable character for most.
Wild is based on Cheryl Strayed’s book of the same name, in which she documents how she hiked the PCT for months after her mother died of cancer and she found herself spiraling out of control in the wake of it all. The hike was her way to force herself to change, by going out of her element and pushing herself to her limits. She’s determined to make her goal despite many setbacks and the constant fear of being raped or assaulted. She’s not rejecting society so much as trying to find her way back in it. Reese Witherspoon plays Cheryl here and I must say, it’s a fantastic performance from her and I wouldn’t be surprised at all if she’s nominated for several awards next year.
As good as Reese is, however, it’s Laura Dern who steals the show as Cheryl’s mom. She is the heart of this film and you can feel (and sometimes see) her character resonate throughout every scene, despite only appearing briefly in flashbacks. Even when faced with certain death, she is more concerned for the well being of others and maintains a positive spirit that’s more than just a facade, more than just allowing herself to be naive. She’s strong, like her daughter.
Director Jean-Marc Vallée garnered some much deserved critical acclaim last year for Dallas Buyers Club and he brings that same level of gritty, stripped down realism here. It works much to the film’s favor and is very different from the approach that Sean Penn took.
By my standard, Wild is so much more than Into the Wild and succeeds in nearly every way I thought that filmed failed, but especially with compelling, relatable characters. I also found it interesting that it deals with issues that a man would never have to face if they chose to go on a journey like this, namely other men choosing to see them as objects.
Don’t write it off as knock-off. It’s so much more than that.
The post Wild first appeared on It's Just Awesome DOT com.]]>The film follows a park ranger tasked with taking care of orphaned gorillas, most left for dead by poachers. He is the heart of the film, his love for the gorillas is so genuine and pure it aches. I think I might have watched an entire film just about him, but the film also follows his fellow park rangers, they are responsible for fighting poachers. When I say fighting I mean literal fighting, with automatic weapons. This is a war, and the prize is elephant ivory and gorilla pelts. Its shocking how violent this can be. The dichotomy is great, the peaceful man who simply wants to take care of the gorillas, and the men who take up arms to defend them.
Then the film shifts gears, rather suddenly, when oil is found in Virunga. With oil comes multinational corporation, bribes, and war. The rangers are stuck in the middle of the chaos and must find their way as their country is literally sold to the highest bidder.
If the film was any one of these stories it would probably be good, but with all three its great. It really feels like you are seeing the story in three dimensions. All too often documentary film makers get tunnel vision and forget that their subjects are surrounded by other compelling characters. Here the background enhances the drama of the main characters. The most painfully emotional moment of the film for me was watching the care taker of the gorillas put on his uniform as he prepares to take up arms to defend the creatures he loves.
This film falls somewhere between “Gorillas in the Mist” and “The Constant Gardener” but with added punch of knowing that its all real. Its a sad reality, but the film reminds us that there are some things worth fighting for. I would highly recommend Virunga.
PS: On a lighter note, I had no idea gorillas like Pringles.
The post Virunga: Guerrillas in the Mist first appeared on It's Just Awesome DOT com.]]>For those of you who know me, you know I am rather obsessed with Stanley Kubrick’s films, all of them, but especially 2001: a space odyssey. I am also a big fan of Terrance Malick’s Tree of Life, despite the objections of my family and friends. Darren Aronofsky is also one of my favorites (except for Noah, which Charles perfectly summed up) and I feel The Fountain to be one of his best. I mention all of this because I believe that Christopher Nolan has mostly achieved what these great film makers were going for in their films, but to achieve it he had to fail where they succeeded.
Interstellar is huge, not only is it projected on 70mm IMAX, but the story spans lifetimes. Characters travel light years, and experience things that no human has ever experienced, yet. But in the end what makes this film work is how small it is. It’s not about man’s place in the universe, or the next step in our evolution, it’s about a father trying to save his daughter. He may have to travel through a worm hole to the other side of the galaxy to do it, but it’s all for her. This is the strongest point of the movie and also the thing that seems out of place. In the other movies I mentioned before it was as though the filmmakers knew that once you started looking at humans in the context of the enormous universe we seem pretty insignificant. This allows them to tell stories that stretch way beyond the lifespan of any one person, and ultimately to really examine what our place in the universe is. Nolan forgoes all this. He would rather examine a father daughter relationship, and kudos to him for doing it. He keeps the audience hooked by that emotion, when the other directors lose their audience.
The brilliance of a film like 2001 is that the story isn’t about a man, but is the story of Man. Same with Tree of Life, it isn’t just about little boys in Texas, its about the Nature of Man. But Nolan makes us think, AND he makes us feel. Does this make it better than the others? In some ways yes, in others no. I don’t think he was trying to say the same things that Kubrick, Malick or Aronofsky were. He was examining the love between a father and a daughter, who happen to be on other sides of the galaxy.
So in the end my feelings about Interstellar are exactly what makes it superior to other space epics, it made me feel.
-Christopher
PS: I will readily acknowledge there are huge, complex plot holes in the movie. But for Christopher Nolan it’s all about that relationship, so a couple missing pieces are Ok. I tend to agree with him, just don’t dig too deep into the astrophysics.
The post Interstellar: Traveling lightyears to go home. first appeared on It's Just Awesome DOT com.]]>